Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:44:16 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will 10.2 also ship with a very stale NTP? Message-ID: <20150712154416.b9f3713893fe28bfab1dd4d7@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20150712050443.GA22240@server.rulingia.com> References: <20150710235810.GA76134@rwpc16.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20150712032256.GB19305@satori.lan> <20150712050443.GA22240@server.rulingia.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As I already mentioned in another post, head has 4.2.8 p3 in-tree. So the answer should be MFC before creation of releng/10.2 is planned or not. On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:04:43 +1000 Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> wrote: > On 2015-Jul-11 23:22:56 -0400, Chris Nehren <cnehren+freebsd-stable@pobox.com> wrote: > >On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:58:11 +1000, John Marshall wrote: > >> It's me again with my annual NTP whinge. > > > >The answer to the perennial "will release $foo ship with old / insecure > >/ otherwise deficient $bar?" is still "install $bar from ports". > > That's a non-answer. It just changes the question to "why bother to > include $bar in base when I need to install the port anyway". > > -- > Peter Jeremy -- Tomoaki AOKI junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150712154416.b9f3713893fe28bfab1dd4d7>