Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:50:23 +0200 From: Christoph Brinkhaus <c.brinkhaus@t-online.de> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: Philipp Erbelding <philipp@copythat.de> Subject: Re: ezjail allow.raw_socket handbook wrong confing Message-ID: <20160425165023.GA1540@esprimo.local> In-Reply-To: <D46F506F-DCCE-44C9-A0E4-CEB097930EBC@copythat.de> References: <mailman.87.1461585601.64317.freebsd-doc@freebsd.org> <D46F506F-DCCE-44C9-A0E4-CEB097930EBC@copythat.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:37:28PM +0200, Philipp Erbelding wrote: Hello Philipp! > Hi, > I think there is a misunderstanding about the issue here. > > > "jailname" in both the paragraph and the configuration line are shown in > > italic because they are strings that the user is supposed to replace > > with the actual jail name. > > > > Would it help to break up that paragraph into shorter sentences? > > > > When raw network sockets are actually needed in a jail, they can be > > enabled. Edit the ezjail configuration file for the individual > > jail, /usr/local/etc/ezjail/jailname. Modify the parameters entry: > > Is the problem with the mentioned section not with the "=1" which is no longer current? > I found this reference in the forums about it only working without the "=1": https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/54365/ > > Kind regards > Philipp export jail_testjail1_parameters="allow.raw_sockets=1" is not mentioned in https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/54365/ But I can confirm that the syntax as export jail_testjail1_parameters="allow.raw_sockets=1" works for me. The last line says: "Edit: My mistake in using the first option, the poster has a jail named shell, but I confused it with the shell of the jail." But it is not clear if that helped to fix the issue or not. Kind regards, Christoph
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160425165023.GA1540>