Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:47:38 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EFI GELI support ready for testers Message-ID: <20160601144738.GA14531@britannica.bec.de> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1606011623410.3503@laptop.wojtek.intra> References: <519CC1FC-84DF-4710-8E62-AF26D8AED2CF@metricspace.net> <20160528083656.GT38613@kib.kiev.ua> <d6b96a6c-4e92-35a5-e78b-cc674b6d2f25@freebsd.org> <20160528172618.GB38613@kib.kiev.ua> <6A9DADE0-B214-424A-BB14-0B0848F0D08D@metricspace.net> <20160529091827.GD38613@kib.kiev.ua> <46B3F9E2-A25B-4F9D-B35F-11AC782495B1@metricspace.net> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1606011623410.3503@laptop.wojtek.intra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:29:16PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > It's undesirable because the whole point of ZFS is to have one ZFS > > volume for the whole system. > This sounds more like a religious dogma than anything else. If "ZFS volume" means "ZFS pool" here, it is also blatant bullshit. There are a lot of reasons for having more than one ZFS pool, the easiest being separating SSDs and HDDs for fast vs cheap storage. Joerg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160601144738.GA14531>