Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 20:52:26 -0700 From: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Cc: Tom Vijlbrief <tvijlbrief@gmail.com>, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> Subject: Re: GPT vs MBR for swap devices Message-ID: <20180615035225.GA37370@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <201806142110.w5ELAL0N046840@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> References: <20180614175622.GC35161@www.zefox.net> <201806142110.w5ELAL0N046840@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 02:10:21PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > It might be interesting to do in order the swapon > commands to 1G USB flash, 1G SD flash, 2G SD flash, It seems clear that USB flash swap, alone or in any combination, fails early in buildworld. 1 GB of SD flash swap seemed to work consideraby better, but even it slowed greatly when 500 MB swap was in use. 3 GB of USB mechanical swap seems to work. 3 GB of SD flash swap (2 GB plus 1 GB) also seemed to work. These tests were not with the same kernel and sources, which makes the comparisons rather suspect. The machine is now reverting to r334939 using 1 GB + 2 GB of SD flash swap. If that succeeds I will then run buildworld for each case using the same kernel, world and sources. Thanks for reading! bob prohaska
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180615035225.GA37370>