Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Jul 2018 22:46:48 +0100
From:      RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: A request for unnested UFS implementation in MBR
Message-ID:  <20180707224648.5187be22@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <f57a5540-9736-53bf-5312-166a1b2e23b0@yandex.com>
References:  <98201d37-2d65-34c6-969e-c9649f1a3ab1@yandex.com> <f57a5540-9736-53bf-5312-166a1b2e23b0@yandex.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 02:20:56 +0530
Manish Jain wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I made a request for FreeBSD UFS filesystem to the freebsd-fs list.
> Just for opinions on this list, I am forwarding that request
> underneath.
> 
> Tx
> Manish Jain
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: A request for unnested UFS implementation in MBR
> Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 11:29:55 +0530
> From: Manish Jain <jude.obscure@yandex.com>
> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I am a longtime user of FreeBSD, which now serves as my only OS.
> 
> There is one request I wished to make for FreeBSD filesystems. While
> UFS implementation under GPT is unnested just as Ext2, the MBR 
> implementation of UFS continues to piggyback on an unnecessary nest
> (in a BSD slice).
> 
> Can it not be considered as an alternative to provide a UFS partition 
> (unnested) under MBR too ?

You can put UFS on an MBR partition if you want to.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180707224648.5187be22>