Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:47:40 GMT From: Martin Simmons <martin@lispworks.com> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: theunusualmatt@gmail.com, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMBv1 Deprecation / SMBv2 support in FreeBSD Message-ID: <201912191647.xBJGleRa028173@higson.cam.lispworks.com> In-Reply-To: <b09c975c-e627-feca-a9a6-c01cddd5d848@quip.cz> (message from Miroslav Lachman on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:12:00 %2B0100) References: <CALJ5sFkKMGvhgRYzegikDTiTTyV1xtA_WYJW_gLkHFN9Oh0OqA@mail.gmail.com> <YTXPR01MB01893E3AAB21A03677998D2FDDDB0@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CALJ5sFnMWGAGS8oyUvzXfq_Z4ZeRzgs==EDZf%2BqO-4O269qdiw@mail.gmail.com> <9b556cbe-f9f3-ab15-6fcd-71397d18c126@freebsd.org> <20170623104654.07e5a3e0@ernst.home> <45b0864b-680c-8fe0-f5a5-353b6373d069@freebsd.org> <YTXPR01MB0189251BCE0A17B8D0C51514DDD80@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CALJ5sF=_9=-UK%2B6NyWg1Wp%2BcZZwu%2BSVDMLUjirjWD9DrHy%2BzEQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170624045543.GY39245@kduck.kaduk.org> <CALJ5sFm%2BeKPonELuo2gTYR88qQz4mocFbd6fOVrTWu5FoPeWcg@mail.gmail.com> <b09c975c-e627-feca-a9a6-c01cddd5d848@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:12:00 +0100, Miroslav Lachman said: > > I would like to resurrect this old thread from 2017-06 as I have the > need to use mount_smbfs on FreeBSD but this old implementation (still) > lacks support for SMB2/3. > > I am not a developer so I cannot do any coding work. I would like to > know if somebody tried to add support for SMBv2 to FreeBSD? Is it really > hard to extend it to support SMB2? Or should it be implemented from scratch? > I tried to find more on this topic in mailing lists and FreeBSD forums > without much success. I found that Apple open source has it. For example > https://opensource.apple.com/source/smb/smb-759.40.1/kernel/smbfs/smbfs_smb_2.c.auto.html > I know Apple kernel is too different but anyway - can it be ported to > FreeBSD in some way? > > It is very sad that FreeBSD is so far behind competitors in some network > service where FreeBSD was very strong in the past. > > CIFS/SMB2 is the only option in some heterogenous environments. Have you tried using sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs? I don't know how fast it is, but I think FreeBSD's FUSE has improved since that thread started. __Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201912191647.xBJGleRa028173>