Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:08:34 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sbufs in userland Message-ID: <22345.983207314@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Feb 2001 04:05:34 %2B1100." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102270336450.19382-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102270336450.19382-100000@besplex.bde.org>, Bruce Ev ans writes: >funopen() is more general than sbufs, so it is not quite as easy to use, >but I think it is easy enough. But we don't have funopen(3) in the kernel... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22345.983207314>