Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:41:19 +0200
From:      =?iso-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 9.2-RC1: LORs / Deadlock with SU+J on HAST in "memsync" mode
Message-ID:  <23FCE234-E811-4160-BCDD-B0E2B832DCD3@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130822093138.GO4972@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <20130819115101.ae9c0cf788f881dc4de464c5@yamagi.org> <20130822102121.a799b116b0f6b0f7c90ba578@yamagi.org> <20130822093138.GO4972@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Konstantin Belousov w dniu 22 sie 2013, o =
godz. 11:31:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:21:21AM +0200, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
>> Hello,
>> attached is a file with the transcript of a dd session containing:
>> - ps
>> - trace
>> - show pcpu
>> - show allpcpu
>> - show locks
>> - show alllocks
>> - show lockedvnods
>> - alltrace
>> If the attachement is eaten by mailman the file can be found here:
>> http://deponie.yamagi.org/freebsd/debug/lor_hast/ddb2.txt
>>=20
>> This is my first deadlock debug session. So if anything is still
>> missing please tell me.
>>=20
> This has absolutely nothing to do with the deadlock we trying to =
catch.
> On your case, it seems that all i/o on the box is stalled, and my =
guess
> is that hastd just recursed waiting for some i/o completion which =
requires
> working hastd to finish.
>=20
> Talk to hastd author(s) about this.

Isn't this just another case of deadlock caused by being out of bufs?

--=20
If you cut off my head, what would I say?  Me and my head, or me and my =
body?




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?23FCE234-E811-4160-BCDD-B0E2B832DCD3>