Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:24:24 -0800 From: Astrodog <astrodog@gmail.com> To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Ports Message-ID: <2fd864e050323182432f78eaa@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20050324011220.GA81046@isis.sigpipe.cz> References: <2fd864e05032316492d805751@mail.gmail.com> <20050324011220.GA81046@isis.sigpipe.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:12:20 +0100, Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz> wrote: > # astrodog@gmail.com / 2005-03-23 16:49:41 -0800: > > I'm finding a huge number of ports that claim to be i386-only, but > > that seem to work fine on AMD64, even moreso on the Linux compat side. > > Are there any thoughts on how to resolve this? > > Find out in cvs why they have been marked i386-only, and if it > doesn't seem to be the case (anymore), file a PR with a patch. > One for each port. > > -- > How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? > You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. > Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 > How could we denote a linux32 dependancy?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2fd864e050323182432f78eaa>