Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 20 Feb 2000 17:05:38 -0600
From:      "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   RE: openssl in -current 
Message-ID:  <3.0.3.32.20000220170538.009084b0@207.227.119.2>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002192215070.8731-100000@freefall.freebsd.o rg>
References:  <1D45ABC754FB1E4888E508992CE97E4F059CE6@teknos.teknos.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:17 PM 2/19/00 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>This doesn't help. The RSA source not being there isn't the problem, the
>problem is that there are two different binary versions depending on how
>you build it (with rsaref or not). Source code builds aren't a problem,
>they already work fine, it's people who install binary snapshots (e.g.
>from the CD).

As one that was bit by this, at a minimum we would need an errata entry, so
that that want need RSA support will need to build the port and rebuild
openssl on the base system, which requires both src/secure and src/crypto.

While I don't have a problem with the cumbersome way of installing a fully
function openssl, it does make more work for the ports guys, and so I'd
vote to drop openssl from the base for the reason that the goal is a "good"
point-oh release.

Ports that depend on RSA should be made to check for the includes, which is
the most obvious error when building.  This being addressed.  Just commenting.

Considering that building and installing world takes quite a while, it
would be nice to have a simple way, so wonder if a simple 'make all
install' in secure/usr.bin/openssl will do it for everything that depends
on openssl.  Chapter 6.5 of the handbook implies that a make world is
needed.  Doesn't bother me (much), but might be considered cruel and
unusual punishment to those not familiar with building.


This whole deal is adding a lot of confusion.  While many of us can work
with/around these problems, it isn't really streamlined.

My big question is - Do we really want to force a 'make world' on the those
that want RSA support in openssl?

That would be ugly, when before it was simply the matter of building only
two ports.

my .02


Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net
Systems/Network Administrator
FreeBSD - the power to serve



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.3.32.20000220170538.009084b0>