Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2000 12:21:26 -0700 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: Kip Macy <kip@lyris.com> Cc: Scott Hess <scott@avantgo.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AIO was Re: Kernel threads Message-ID: <3870F6B6.EC4EE37E@softweyr.com> References: <Pine.SOL.4.05.10001031107090.6488-100000@luna.lyris.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kip Macy wrote:
>
> >
> > The best fix I've thought of thus far (other than async I/O, which I
> > understand isn't ready for prime time) would be to have a number of kernel
>
> Speaking of AIO, which I would really like to use if possible, how
> actively maintained is it? The copyright on vfs_aio.c is 1997, suggesting
> to me that John Dyson has moved onto other things.
It's passively maintained. ;^)
I've become a little familiar with the code, and BDE has graciously agreed
to review whatever I do to make sure I don't hobble it. If you need help,
yell.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3870F6B6.EC4EE37E>