Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 11:38:54 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, asami@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Patches rules (Was: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/qpopper Makefile ports/mail/qpopper/patchespatch-manpages ports/mail/qpopper/pkg MESSAGE PLISTports/mail/qpopper/scripts pre-install) Message-ID: <3975691E.2E57CE99@FreeBSD.org> References: <200007190731.AAA03974@freefall.freebsd.org> <39756134.DC76C6B7@FreeBSD.org> <20000719100926.A14534@cichlids.cichlids.com> <397563F6.637203D4@FreeBSD.org> <20000719103430.A16056@cichlids.cichlids.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.org): > > > Could someone authoritative judge us on the topic? The question is that we have > > written rules for patches (http://www.freebsd.org/porters-handbook/x313.html), but > > some committers refuse to follow it (see this thread on cvs-all). > > Documentation can be changed. It's not about documentation, it's about estabilished rules and principles. Documentation only reflects it. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3975691E.2E57CE99>