Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 12:47:47 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/windowmaker Makefile distinfo pkg-plistports/x11-wm/windowmaker/files patch-am patch-wsetfont Message-ID: <3B121EC3.C319ED27@FreeBSD.org> References: <200105271531.f4RFV6u31074@freefall.freebsd.org> <3B120575.AC6CBC72@DougBarton.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote: > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > sobomax 2001/05/27 08:31:06 PDT > > > > Modified files: > > x11-wm/windowmaker Makefile distinfo pkg-plist > > Added files: > > x11-wm/windowmaker/files patch-am patch-wsetfont > > Log: > > 1. Backport two patches from windowmaker-i18n port; > > 2. add wmicons into RUN_DEPENDS and remove similar functionality from > > this port; > > This is probably a good way to go with this, but the wmicons port has > severe fetch'ing problems. None of the first several files could be found > on any of the master sites, they all had to be fetched from > ftp.freebsd.org. Given the long connection time outs and delays I finally > gave up and deleted all the master sites from the Makefile so I'm not sure > about the rest of the stuff. Ok, I'll look into this problem. > > 3. due to (1) bump PORTREVISION. > > (Once again,) I really think we need to be more conservative with bumping > this. The end result of what you get with this change is exactly the same, > with the addition of a few new icons. IMO that doesn't amount to a change > in functionality, so it doesn't deserve to be bumped. You are not quite correct. As my message clearly indicates, PORTREVISION was bumped not due to icons, but due to two additional patches backported from i18n version of the port. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B121EC3.C319ED27>