Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:19:22 +0200 From: Kees Jan Koster <kjkoster@kjkoster.org> To: Sharkie <shark.fin.soup@mac.com>, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why cannot I allocate more than -Xmx700M Message-ID: <3CD88297-2C6A-4E1C-A114-002599898B91@kjkoster.org> In-Reply-To: <728977D1-FDFA-495B-80D3-D9D060FA5082@mac.com> References: <2849C2B9-6990-4F51-A430-06E99D745816@mac.com> <97C57C69-1708-4176-86BC-E2B733BF0ACA@kjkoster.org> <7B413A97-AC11-4FD4-9BD5-40CC21593488@mac.com> <be800d230808181304p7f8ad74fx8c92bdb511c08062@mail.gmail.com> <6E041876-88CC-45CB-9739-C3EB5686EEF5@mac.com> <be800d230808182251u16c051dfw64185de393ec92df@mail.gmail.com> <5AD97FD4-50C1-4C43-93FE-4EA7F782D03E@mac.com> <be800d230808182336i550ea3cekab622ede99f52d34@mail.gmail.com> <48AA6E00.7040408@irfu.se> <728977D1-FDFA-495B-80D3-D9D060FA5082@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Sharkie, > I think I was 1 GIG of physical ram. I am getting service in for my > machine now. Strange. I have a box with 768MB RAM and it will happily allocate 1GB for a JVM. That is, I can run "Hello World" -Xmx1G and -Xmx1000M just fine. This is using the native JVM. What version are you using? -- Kees Jan http://java-monitor.com/forum/ kjkoster@kjkoster.org 06-51838192 The secret of success lies in the stability of the goal. -- Benjamin Disraeli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CD88297-2C6A-4E1C-A114-002599898B91>