Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 02:21:10 -0000 From: "Bruno Afonso" <hununu@netcabo.pt> To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Feature Request Message-ID: <3E1CDC96.24785.27A7458@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20030109000005.GB15778@smnolde.com> References: <200301082231.JAA17004@lightning.itga.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 Jan 2003 at 19:00, Scott M. Nolde wrote: > I understand that rules can be added and removed, but in most cases, once > the ruleset is "stable" nothing much changes. Having a relative skip > would help me since I have written a number of ipfw-based firewall scripts > which could benefit from a relative skip. If you happen to need to make some quick changes, you will not see it that way. You will have to re-read the entire ruleset, calculate the skips, etc. imho, this feature would used by 1% of users. I honestly can't think of any big advantages in the long run at all. Bruno Miguel Afonso, Biological Eng. student. brunomiguel at dequim dot ist dot utl dot pt D.E.Q. @ I.S.T. - Portugal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E1CDC96.24785.27A7458>