Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 09:11:18 -0300 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Subject: Re: NOCRYPT / NOSECURE Message-ID: <3EC4D566.5070306@tcoip.com.br> In-Reply-To: <200305152344.h4FNi4gN032787@grimreaper.grondar.org> References: <200305152344.h4FNi4gN032787@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Murray wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
>
>>Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> writes:
>>
>>>If openssl's des(1) is the same as our bdes(1) (ie, gives the same results)
>>>then I'm in support of this.
>>
>>I haven't compared OpenSSL'S des(1) directly with bdes(1), but they
>>are both ports (or reimplementations) of Sun's des(1), and I've used
>>OpenSSL's des(1) in the past to exchange data with Solaris users who
>>were using Sun's des(1).
>
>
> I've converted our bdes(1) to use the openSSL library. I've also done
> ed(1). :-). libcipher is now OBE.
1) What happens if I compile with no crypto (whatever it is/will be
called these days)?
2) ed(1) is /bin/ed. Won't that cause trouble?
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
Gerencia de Operacoes
Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados
Coordenacao de Seguranca
VIVO Centro Oeste Norte
Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904
E-mail: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br
Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br
dcs@tcoip.com.br
Outros:
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org
capo@notorious.bsdconspiracy.net
Chocolate Chip.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EC4D566.5070306>