Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:15:01 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@acm.org> To: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> Cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld? Message-ID: <3F132B65.1040506@acm.org> References: <20030713214715.H15811@root.org> <20030714004042.A38507@hub.freebsd.org> <20030714160952.GD12996@roark.gnf.org> <3F130805.3060900@acm.org> <20030714194815.GJ12996@roark.gnf.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gordon Tetlow wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:44:05PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: >>Gordon Tetlow wrote: >>>>On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: >>>>>It appears /rescue is cleaning for way too much as part of buildworld. >>>>>For instance, groff is NOT part of /rescue (or we have other things to >>>>>discuss. :) This adds a bit of time to buildworld, can it be removed? >>>> >>Yeah, I took a few shortcuts; /rescue does build far more in >>OBJDIR than it needs to, and similarly cleans much more than it needs >>to. (Those extra dirs are never populated, but building and cleaning >>them does still take time.) I believe the attached patch addresses >>this issue; it trims down /usr/obj/usr/src/rescue/rescue/usr/src/... to >>just the directories actually needed. > > This solution is kinda hackish, I have a more generic solution that makes > it easier to add programs without having to specifically add > CRUNCH_SRCDIR_foo to every program outside of src/bin and src/sbin. I'm > hoping to iron out the wrinkles today and post the patches. Other than > that the patch is pretty much complete. Great! Looking forward to it. Do take a look, though at the edits near the end of that patch file. There are a couple of corrections there that actually complete the support for CRUNCH_SRCDIR_foo, and should be included even if you solve this particular problem in a more sophisticated way. Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F132B65.1040506>