Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 01:23:05 +0900 From: Rob Lahaye <lahaye@snu.ac.kr> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [full build as of Sept. 24] "No route to host" after certain time... Message-ID: <3F71C4E9.8030801@snu.ac.kr> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20030924121543.08c1c060@209.112.4.2> References: <3F719A58.5000700@snu.ac.kr> <6.0.0.22.0.20030924103406.0307c250@209.112.4.2> <20030924151245.GA7400@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> <6.0.0.22.0.20030924111529.05a965d0@209.112.4.2> <20030924153450.GB7648@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> <6.0.0.22.0.20030924114051.06fb5e58@209.112.4.2> <20030924160520.GA7970@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> <6.0.0.22.0.20030924121543.08c1c060@209.112.4.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Tancsa wrote: > > If you have all the aliases on lo0 does it work ? i.e. just have > x.y.z.33 on fxp0. However, another poster had a problem with a /20 > subnet. I wonder if its an incorrect mask calculation ? Don't forget the bit of randomness that's part of the game, as it appears, at least. Different results from boot to boot. Maybe uninitialized variable, that gets a random value, which is most of the time zero? Or something the like. R.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F71C4E9.8030801>