Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:13:37 +0100
From:      John Angelmo <john@adminforum.se>
To:        Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: __fpclassifyd problem
Message-ID:  <3FA01F71.1020203@adminforum.se>
In-Reply-To: <20031028090337.E27950@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References:  <3F92E129.10307@veidit.net> <20031028034630.GC32916@VARK.homeunix.com> <20031028090337.E27950@carver.gumbysoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug White wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote:
> 
> 
>>I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that
>>this was fixed last night in:
>>
>>	src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c,v1.8
>>	src/lib/msun/src/e_scalb.c,v1.10
>>
>>The fix was to use the old versions of isnan() and isinf()
>>specifically in the two places in libm where they are needed.
> 
> 
> okay, so the $65,000 question is:
> 
> Does this make the Diablo JDKs work? :)
> 


I could test, should I just get those files from current, integrate with 
5.1-p10 and recompile?





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FA01F71.1020203>