Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:15:49 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Rebecca Cran <bcran@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: GPT boot has less features than legacy MBR-based one (Was: UEFI, loader.efi and /boot.config) Message-ID: <3f4214e2-36af-cc87-0a3c-2c7ce26cffd8@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfq%2BmuSr=CX4V9_ebWwNv1S49=mJZms0ZVoCB2onp%2BqHNA@mail.gmail.com> References: <912985968.20190119125228@serebryakov.spb.ru> <etPan.5c433dd9.327b23c6.1973@bluestop.org> <1951151017.20190119235425@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4636753.YNO7O01DYZ@photon.int.bluestop.org> <17710465740.20190120134042@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CANCZdfq%2BmuSr=CX4V9_ebWwNv1S49=mJZms0ZVoCB2onp%2BqHNA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --2aSw5NYCn9CkLzY5s36r1FiQNZAopcgSk Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="veVTjMQFGzT1tkgEyEe262V3FyOFj56sk"; protected-headers="v1" From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Rebecca Cran <bcran@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <3f4214e2-36af-cc87-0a3c-2c7ce26cffd8@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: GPT boot has less features than legacy MBR-based one (Was: UEFI, loader.efi and /boot.config) References: <912985968.20190119125228@serebryakov.spb.ru> <etPan.5c433dd9.327b23c6.1973@bluestop.org> <1951151017.20190119235425@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4636753.YNO7O01DYZ@photon.int.bluestop.org> <17710465740.20190120134042@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CANCZdfq+muSr=CX4V9_ebWwNv1S49=mJZms0ZVoCB2onp+qHNA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfq+muSr=CX4V9_ebWwNv1S49=mJZms0ZVoCB2onp+qHNA@mail.gmail.com> --veVTjMQFGzT1tkgEyEe262V3FyOFj56sk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 20.01.2019 20:05, Warner Losh wrote: > Is too complicated? Boot1.efi doesn't allow that, but loader.efi does. loader.efi lives on ESP partition, do I understand it right? So, it could not be damaged with "bad" upgrade? --=20 // Lev Serebryakov --veVTjMQFGzT1tkgEyEe262V3FyOFj56sk-- --2aSw5NYCn9CkLzY5s36r1FiQNZAopcgSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE+W0coLX0MYtnSzMK6rA8WL/cR48FAlxFt/tfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEY5 NkQxQ0EwQjVGNDMxOEI2NzRCMzMwQUVBQjAzQzU4QkZEQzQ3OEYACgkQ6rA8WL/c R49F6A/+Piedj57ZU9nc+qz77Xr7epsnyjOTI3mtlBNThcfqLb23cDq8NSsozNAq vdODXW5tD/jq5lKwSPyhjyEdSl0iSPhjEQr6/1yQixJ7gi5mhxkN6Yx1ciSeKMwU q9VtSITgInZ7ZeedMArNO/MflpFS0jhIAWqLnEj4fPjXgJWed3hN9e0ZDkcROJBE xFv039jhwais0xPPzp5/WedyKxy+JtKNHoczqL99s2FbceAWutes0DYWyvQPSq7z yQIRrWwOsea1054uUi5RMa+zVkBE0gOdgppUCpJjSJkBBjuGhAqUd9pXExfcXLse yG8bZGKINbOqQUXuxjRcdiwti3GsEdJNiAmMh7d3+bc9bC+ZbfkXzc7xlWegNEFq AxD+1DcIwQhec/PnnGtp9vty6iMhfa6y8ycR+J58Apqp6jZKyFi1ITs2wV0HJdz1 KfByTlspUeoCFnAynOqMAQl16EVA4O/hM2sNc0TR8oSo5pbVUeSmpdjfTRM6X/Gm lDDyiQ5oI1u4NUaLnC3z1Mj9ggSkbYLW6RMpdpfBO1/gPwHAIQ3d3tifNUBlCHqt tQ0Lvfm2cdINX/FcpxEK8lROlxd04BVIRZg1gZJyl+T1a8Be6ui0tKcfk6j0QS3z 67qhI1aRIYYpAaDlYj0Rklrl5npQ5Od3EwnmopVK32cew7p2Waw= =biHf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2aSw5NYCn9CkLzY5s36r1FiQNZAopcgSk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3f4214e2-36af-cc87-0a3c-2c7ce26cffd8>