Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:26:15 -0700
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be>, Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org>
Cc:        Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: The Merger, and what will its effects be on committers?
Message-ID:  <4.2.2.20000313111904.041e0c00@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <v04220804b4f2dd15c64c@[195.238.24.123]>
References:  <4.2.2.20000313103859.0410fe30@localhost> <4.2.2.20000312160425.00b16e80@localhost> <Pine.LNX.4.20.0003112034290.431-100000@theory8.physics.iisc.ernet.in> <4.2.2.20000312122651.00b1e880@localhost> <4.2.2.20000312144558.04190e80@localhost> <4.2.2.20000312160425.00b16e80@localhost> <4.2.2.20000313103859.0410fe30@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:02 AM 3/13/2000 , Brad Knowles wrote:

>         But FreeBSD is not just a kernel (like Linux is).  It's a kernel plus all the userland stuff and a whole lot more.  Therefore, you can't have another "distribution" of FreeBSD, unless it includes all the exact same stuff that FreeBSD does.

Non sequitur. Red Hat, and other Linux distributors, do their own builds
of the Linux kernel with unique features and drivers. For example, Red
Hat ships with Winmodem support while other distributions do not, and
their product is still called Linux!

There's no reason why this should not be true for FreeBSD. Since FreeBSD 
includes a "userland," creators of distributions should be able to provide 
enhancements there too. Anyone who omitted something or broke existing 
software would, of course, be subjected to the wrath of users, so the 
market would quickly take care of any omissions.

>         If you want to take FreeBSD and make your own modifications, you're welcome to do so and call it "WhateverYouWantBSD", but you can't call it FreeBSD 

In that case, Walnut Creek should not be able to do that either. So, again,
the FreeBSD Foundation should require it to change the names of all of its
"enhanced" FreeBSD packages. Otherwise, it is not being evenhanded.

>-- because the FreeBSD core team and the FreeBSD Foundation would have no control over your product, you can't use their copyrighted name.  

Do you understand intellectual property law? It's a trademark, not a "copyrighted name."

--Brett



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.2.20000313111904.041e0c00>