Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 09:40:59 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Plagiarism (Was: FreeBSD spokesman) Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20010706093248.04533cf0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20010706173117.N99228@lpt.ens.fr> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010706090739.045bc340@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20010703141550.045f5340@localhost> <20010705123729.M371@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010705125211.04638740@localhost> <20010705224626.O47721@lpt.ens.fr> <4.3.2.7.2.20010705163434.04524b00@localhost> <20010706103808.A99228@lpt.ens.fr> <20010706151421.I99228@lpt.ens.fr> <4.3.2.7.2.20010706071808.04536ef0@localhost> <20010706170429.M99228@lpt.ens.fr> <4.3.2.7.2.20010706090739.045bc340@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 09:31 AM 7/6/2001, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: >[Greg] abided by perfectly adequate attribution standards for this medium. Not so. Daemon News is a technical journal that also appears in print. >Despite my lack of respect for Webster, Argumentum ad hominem again. >I still assume that the authors are consistent and don't >change the meaning of a verb mid-sentence. Again, see the Merriam-Webster definition online. >You're just arguing in circles, No, Rahul, YOU are. Your arguments have been so weak that you've now resorted to arguing ad hominem against authoritative sources such as Webster's dictionary and the MLA Manual. You are apparently unwilling, at any cost, to admit that you did not know the full meaning of the word "plagiarism." I think I've proved to the satisfaction of any resonable person that what Greg did crossed well over the line, and that he owes me, at the very least, an apology. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20010706093248.04533cf0>