Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:29:11 -0500
From:      Richard Coleman <rcoleman@criticalmagic.com>
To:        Mark Russell <freebsd@mark.net.au>
Cc:        Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net>
Subject:   Re: HEADSUP: INDEX[-5] files were removed from CVS.
Message-ID:  <41962847.1090608@criticalmagic.com>
In-Reply-To: <20041114003532.L60099@juana.isp.net.au>
References:  <20041113101925.GB70256@voodoo.oberon.net> <20041114003532.L60099@juana.isp.net.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Russell wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
>> Since CVS version of INDEX was always out-dated, portmgr decided to
>>  remove it from CVS tree.  You will still be able to build your own
>>  INDEX or use 'fetchindex' target in /usr/ports/.
> 
> please back this out, it breaks things, I've never found an out of
> date index to be a problem, now not havign an index is causing
> problems, also the extra bandwidth for fetch index is a hassle.
> 
> at least let the issue be discused on the list.

Just change your cvsup script to rebuild INDEX[-5] afterwards.  That's 
what I do.  The change is fine with me.

Richard Coleman
rcoleman@criticalmagic.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41962847.1090608>