Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:24:11 +0100
From:      Doug Rabson <dfr@rabson.org>
To:        Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: VOP_LEASE 
Message-ID:  <41ED3941-E5E6-45F0-B880-C1B2861FDE32@rabson.org>
In-Reply-To: <200804121703.m3CH3StJ081660@chez.mckusick.com>
References:  <200804121703.m3CH3StJ081660@chez.mckusick.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 12 Apr 2008, at 18:03, Kirk McKusick wrote:

>> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:13:15 -1000 (HST)
>> From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@jroberson.net>
>> To: arch@freebsd.org
>> Subject: VOP_LEASE
>>
>> As far as I can tell this has never been used.  Unless someone can  
>> show me
>> otherwise I'm going to go ahead and remove it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jeff
>
> VOP_LEASE is used by NQNFS and NFSv4. It notifies them when a file
> is modified locally so that they know to update any outstanding
> leases (e.g., evict any write lease for the file and do callbacks
> for any read leases for the file). Deleting VOP_LEASE would break
> NFS big time.

I think our NQNFS support might have been removed some time ago - I  
can't see any calls to VOP_LEASE in the code right now. Something like  
VOP_LEASE would certainly be useful for a hypothetical future NFSv4  
server. I believe that samba could use it too for its oplocks feature  
which appears to be similar to NQNFS's leases and NFSv4's delegations.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41ED3941-E5E6-45F0-B880-C1B2861FDE32>