Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:09:09 -0700
From:      John Pettitt <jpp@cloudview.com>
To:        cpghost@cordula.ws
Cc:        freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: HZ=1000 ?
Message-ID:  <4251C915.1000009@cloudview.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050404093755.GA48928@epia2.farid-hajji.net>
References:  <20050404091719.GA9748@lothlorien.nagual.st> <20050404093755.GA48928@epia2.farid-hajji.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


cpghost@cordula.ws wrote:

>
>Interestingly, HZ=100 has remained constant for decades (!), despite
>CPUs getting faster all the time. This is an excellent value for most
>typical usage patterns. Cranking it up should only be required for
>special cases. Anyway, the HZ knob is there. Experiment with it until
>you get optimal performance.
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
In the dim and distant past (like 1983) some systems used HZ=50 or HZ=60
depending on where in the world they were.   I used an MP/M based box
that took it's clock tick from the power line (no good RTC hardware
available but the power company keeps pretty good time).

John



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4251C915.1000009>