Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:14:15 -0500 From: Jon Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> To: Eivind Hestnes <eivind@stabbursmoen.no> Cc: performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Performance Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT) Message-ID: <42655887.7060203@alumni.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050419183335.F18008131@joshua.stabbursmoen.no> References: <20050419183335.F18008131@joshua.stabbursmoen.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/19/2005 1:32 PM, Eivind Hestnes wrote: > I have an Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT) NIC (em(4) driver 1.7.35) installed > in a Pentium III 500 Mhz with 512 MB RAM (100 Mhz) running FreeBSD 5.4-RC3. > The machine is routing traffic between multiple VLANs. Recently I did a > benchmark with/without device polling enabled. Without device polling I was > able to transfer roughly 180 Mbit/s. The router however was suffering when > doing this benchmark. Interrupt load was peaking 100% - overall the system > itself was quite unusable (_very_ high system load). With device polling > enabled the interrupt kept stable around 40-50% and max transfer rate was > nearly 70 Mbit/s. Not very scientific tests, but it gave me a pin point. The card is plugged into a 32-bit PCI slot, correct? If so, 180 Mbit/s is decent. I have a gigabit LAN at home using Pro 1000 MTs (in 32-bit PCI slots) and get NFS transfers maxing out around 23 MB/s, which is ~180 Mbit/s. Gigabit performance with 32-bit cards is atrocious. It reminds me of the old 100 Mbit/s ISA cards... > <snip> > > HZ set to 1000 as recommended in README for the em(4) driver. Driver is of > cource compiled into kernel. You'll need HZ set to more than 1000 for gigabit; bump it up to at least 2000. That should increase polling throughput a lot. I'm not sure about other polling parameters, however. Jon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42655887.7060203>