Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 May 2005 08:17:27 -0600
From:      secmgr <security@jim-liesl.org>
To:        Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: State of gvinum RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_4 ?!
Message-ID:  <4280C277.4030904@jim-liesl.org>
In-Reply-To: <8b6eae96050510071037d3b6e4@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <8b6eae96050510071037d3b6e4@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Edwin Brown wrote:

>All:
>
>I've been asked to setup a RAID-5 server using software raid. I've not
>worked with gvinum or vinum for that matter. I know from following the
>mailing lists there have been some concerns over gvinum in the
>5.3-RELEASE. How are things working today?
>
>The plan would be use a 40GB ATA/100 Drive for the system and 4 SATA
>drives for the RAID-5 array. Will gvinum be happy with this kind of
>arrangement?
>
Well, you want to stay away from vinum in 5.x.  Under 5.3 gvinum and 
raid 5 was not robust, and I could kill a system and corrupt the array 
by pulling a drive.  I haven't tried lately, but i'd definitly want to 
do some serious testing before putting that into production.  If you 
really need raid 5, I'd look into a H/W based solution.

and yes, I filed PR's that so far have not been answered.

jim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4280C277.4030904>