Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 16:58:15 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange top(1) output Message-ID: <42836F07.1030100@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <42836B8F.607@alumni.rice.edu> References: <c21e92e20505100316667e6bd4@mail.gmail.com> <1115815807.8809.3.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <20050512103929.GB1320@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <200505121349.31508.dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20050512131219.GB3107@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <42836B8F.607@alumni.rice.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jonathan Noack wrote: > What happens if the command is long enough to overrun the screen? Is > the thread information truncated and lost? I believe this was the > argument for making a separate column for the thread info. How about leaving either SIZE or RES out, the one which makes less sense for typical use (probably SIZE which, afaik, is quite pointless in the presence of an overcomitting memory allocator, and the curious user could consult ps if he's really interested in that). mkb.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42836F07.1030100>