Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:35:21 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux gnome libraries etc. Message-ID: <43157302@serv3.int.kfs.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080214091408.GA82434@freebsd.org> (Roman Divacky's message of "Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:14:08 %2B0100") References: <20080213224717.GA59146@freebsd.org> <53884346@ipt.ru> <20080214091408.GA82434@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:14:08 +0100 Roman Divacky wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 02:41:09AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:47:17 +0100 Roman Divacky wrote: > > > > > I noticed that linux-pango is version 1.10 (latest is 1.18), > > > linux-glib2 is 2.6 (latest is 2.14) etc. etc. > > > > linux-glib2 is glib2-2.6.6-1, the lastest available for FedoraCore-4: > > http://mirror.eas.muohio.edu/fedora/linux/core/updates/4/i386/glib2-2.6.6-1.i386.rpm > > > > > I tried to run firefox 3 beta 3 under linux emulation and > > > it crashed because of some missing symbol in pango and I think > > > its because our linux-pango is really outdated and does not > > > meet the minimal requirements for firefox3. > > > > > why havent these ports been updated? > > > > The port won't ever be updated. More likely a new port, say > > linux-f7-glib2 will appear after the default osrelease is switched > > to 2.6.x. > ah.... good to know.. will there be some sort of "update from fc4 to fc7" script? I need to think about it. Maybe standard portupgrade/else would be enough. WBR -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43157302>