Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:58:43 +0300 From: Pertti Kosunen <pertti.kosunen@pp.nic.fi> To: ferdinand.goldmann@jku.at Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dummynet, em driver, device polling issues :-(( Message-ID: <4343CE03.7090008@pp.nic.fi> In-Reply-To: <4343C559.5000000@jku.at> References: <4341089F.7010504@jku.at> <20051003104548.GB70355@cell.sick.ru> <4341242F.9060602@jku.at> <20051003123210.GF70355@cell.sick.ru> <43426EF3.3020404@jku.at> <9CD8C672-1EF2-42FE-A61E-83DC684C893D@dragondata.com> <43429157.90606@jku.at> <4342987D.7000200@benswebs.com> <20051004161217.GB43195@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <1128470191.75484.TMDA@seddon.ca> <979B163D-7078-4558-9095-DC329707A5B4@dragondata.com> <4343C559.5000000@jku.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ferdinand Goldmann wrote: > 944mbps is a very good value, anyway. What we see in our setup are > throuput rates around 300mbps or below. When testing with tcpspray, > throughput hardly exceeded 13MB/s. Increasing MTU should help to get better results, as long all devices in network support jumbo frames (at least on large files). 9k or even 16k might be supported.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4343CE03.7090008>