Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:17:21 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel cpu entries Message-ID: <43A0FC61.3060704@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <43A0EC9F.9080800@paradise.net.nz> References: <20051215002618.B4D3B5D07@ptavv.es.net> <43A0E607.2030101@alumni.rice.edu> <43A0E916.7070204@samsco.org> <43A0EC9F.9080800@paradise.net.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Is a minor update to the handbook needed in order avoid confusion > then? e.g. I have been commenting out CPU_I586 on all my PIII systems > in the (mistaken it would seem) belief that having CPU_I686 only was > better. Agreed, i have always just used I686, assuming it inherited the features of I586. I think most people will assume this.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43A0FC61.3060704>