Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:34:31 -0500 From: Jonathan Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -current is sluggish Message-ID: <43ED3F27.1080808@alumni.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <20060211010509.GA1947@flame.pc> References: <43ED294A.2050505@savvis.net> <200602110128.50618.max@love2party.net> <20060211003846.GA153@uci.agh.edu.pl> <43ED3423.5060500@alumni.rice.edu> <20060211010216.GA6287@uci.agh.edu.pl> <20060211010509.GA1947@flame.pc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-02-11 02:02, Krzysztof Kowalik <kkowalik@uci.agh.edu.pl> wrote: >> Jonathan Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> wrote: >>> I think debug.cpufreq.lowest is what you want. It is documented in >>> cpufreq(4): >> Oh, indeed. And to think that I actually did read this manual page. >> Thank you. :-) > > Isn't the minimum level limited by dev.cpu.0.freq_levels though? My recollection is that setting debug.cpufreq.lowest would result in low values being removed from dev.cpu.0.freq_levels. So if dev.cpu.0.freq_levels started at "800/-1 400/-1 200/-1 100/-1" and you set debug.cpufreq.lowest to "300", dev.cpu.0.freq_levels would then become "800/-1 400/-1". -Jonathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43ED3F27.1080808>