Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:03:32 +0100 From: Remko Lodder <remko@FreeBSD.org> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en where.sgml Message-ID: <441302E4.6010805@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20060311152536.GD73523@submonkey.net> References: <200603111503.k2BF3bsI006826@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060311152536.GD73523@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 03:03:37PM +0000, Remko Lodder wrote:
>> remko 2006-03-11 15:03:37 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD doc repository
>>
>> Modified files:
>> en where.sgml
>> Log:
>> Use &base; in the where.sgml file like other files also use.
>>
>> PR: www/94098
>> Submitted by: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor dot kovesdan at t-hosting dot hu>
>>
>> Revision Changes Path
>> 1.81 +51 -51 www/en/where.sgml
>
> While I am not wildly opposed to this, I don't really see what this
> gains us, other than to make the rendered page (at least) 102 bytes
> larger (&base; being equivalent to "./" most of the time).
>
> I'm all for consistency, but perhaps we should go the other way.
> Comments?
>
> Ceri
Well, If we use it throughout the tree we should do it for consistency.
That was my goal with the commit. I can agree with you that &base; = .
seems somewhat bogus, but when we change the base entity declaration we
have everything in place to be updated in one go.
So i can see your point, and i can see the other point..
Do others have ideas as well? Copied -doc for that reason so that we
have a broad base to get this right :)
Thanks for the feedback though!
--
Kind regards,
Remko Lodder ** remko@elvandar.org
FreeBSD ** remko@FreeBSD.org
/* Quis custodiet ipsos custodes */
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?441302E4.6010805>