Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:59:01 -0400
From:      Stephen Clark <Stephen.Clark@seclark.us>
To:        Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
Message-ID:  <444FD105.1050108@seclark.us>
In-Reply-To: <444FAE19.3060404@errno.com>
References:  <444E2503.9090506@seclark.us>	<6.2.3.4.0.20060425093417.068dfc08@64.7.153.2>	<444E5608.4050704@seclark.us>	<6.2.3.4.0.20060425134955.051d58d0@64.7.153.2>	<444F750C.7070206@seclark.us> <444FAE19.3060404@errno.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sam Leffler wrote:

>Stephen Clark wrote:
>  
>
>>Mike Tancsa wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>At 01:02 PM 25/04/2006, Stephen Clark wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>>Try first
>>>>>sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0
>>>>>
>>>>>If its still slower, try using FAST_IPSEC instead on the server.  
>>>>>However, make sure you disable INET6
>>>>>    
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>That increased it to 39mbits/sec. Still far from 54mbits/sec
>>>>  
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Are all of the TCP params (compare sysctl -a net.inet.tcp on both )and 
>>>application defaults still the same on both systems ?   One that that 
>>>for sure is not in RELENG_4 is SACK. Try disabling that and see if 
>>>there is a difference.
>>>
>>>        ---Mike
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>I checked the sysctl's between the two system and where the match they 
>>are the same. The raw transfer rate ~94mbits/sec is the same as I was 
>>getting between the systems when they were both 4.9.  The real 
>>difference appears to be in ipsec. The other thing that is interesting 
>>is the idle time when I am running this test on the 6.x system is about 
>>70% when it was a 4.9 system getting 54mbits/sec the idle time was only 
>>50-55%.
>>
>>I am reluctant to try fast ipsec because of problems I had when I tried 
>>it under 4.9, it didn't work with our existing sites.
>>    
>>
>
>There are known locking bottlenecks in the crypto subsystem that fast 
>ipsec depends on.  This is consistent with idle time going up.
>
>Not sure when they'll be fixed but I know they're important to at least 
>one person.
>
>	Sam
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>  
>
Hi Sam,

I am going to try the fast ipsec.

Regards,
Steve

-- 

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."  (Ben Franklin)

"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty 
decreases."  (Thomas Jefferson)






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?444FD105.1050108>