Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:54:12 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC) Message-ID: <44F7BCF4.9080804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <MwX7iB/6Y/@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <44F4E40C.7000101@elischer.org> <44E9582C.2010400@rsu.ru> <20060825220033.GC16768@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20060826055402.W43127@fledge.watson.org> <200608291627.32524.jhb@freebsd.org> <44F4E40C.7000101@elischer.org> <44F5534C.5070207@freebsd.org> <MwX7iB/6Y/@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dirk Meyer wrote:
> OpenLDAP is not the only LDAP software,
> there are much more leighweight implementations around.
That's a very interesting statement. What would be slightly more useful are
references to these other implementations, preferably with some insight into
their licensing terms. I think the consensus is pretty heavily on the side
of not adding any more new GPL software, for example.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44F7BCF4.9080804>