Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:22:50 -0400
From:      Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To:        Lars Eighner <portsuser@larseighner.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Xscreensaver conflicts
Message-ID:  <44obomt4d1.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206132114400.40493@abbf.ynefrvtuareubzr.pbz> (Lars Eighner's message of "Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:24:31 -0500 (CDT)")
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206132114400.40493@abbf.ynefrvtuareubzr.pbz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lars Eighner <portsuser@larseighner.com> writes:

> xscreensaver-gnome-hacks will not install if xscreensaver is installed
> ("write files to the same place")
>
> gnome requires xscreensaver-gnome-hacks
>
> kde4 requires xscreensaver
>
> It appears to me that if you force pkg_delete of xscreensaver and install
> xscreensaver-gnome-hacks first, you can reinstall xscreensaver without
> complaints.
>
> I grepped UPDATING for xscreensaver without any hits and do not find this
> documented.  I suspect the conflicts line in the Makefile
> xscreensave-gnome-hacks is not accurate.

The pkg-plist files have a number of common entries, so my suspicion
would be the opposite; that xscreensaver ought to have a corresponding
CONFLICTS line. 

Gnome can be configured (by an option) to use xscreensaver, if I'm
reading the Makefile correctly.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44obomt4d1.fsf>