Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:54:53 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: Jamie Bowden <ragnar@sysabend.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! Message-ID: <450AA29D.9000700@cs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <d6895b7d0609140844re8260fel953ddfeff0a9edf8@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060909182831.GA32004@FS.denninger.net> <200609100159.k8A1xAIn089481@drugs.dv.isc.org> <d6895b7d0609140844re8260fel953ddfeff0a9edf8@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jamie Bowden schrieb: > On 9/9/06, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org> wrote: > >> > Yeah, -STABLE is what you should run if you want stable code, right? > > >> No. STABLE means STABLE API. > > >> If you want stable code you run releases. Between releases >> stable can become unstable. Think of stable as permanent >> BETA code. Changes have passed the first level of testing >> in current which is permanent ALPHA code. > > > No, this is what it means now. [...] Why do you say "No" if you mean "Yes, but in former times ..."? Björn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?450AA29D.9000700>