Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:54:45 +0200
From:      Heinrich Rebehn <rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de>
To:        Eric <heli@mikestammer.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, michael graffam <mikegraffam@yahoo.com>
Subject:   Re: Another whirl with FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <452C8725.3070502@ant.uni-bremen.de>
In-Reply-To: <452C06C8.10602@mikestammer.com>
References:  <20061008033805.56892.qmail@web33713.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <452C06C8.10602@mikestammer.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric wrote:
> michael graffam wrote:
>> Hi, my name is Michael and I'm and Open Source addict.
>>
>>
>> Enough with the re-introductions, I guess.
>> Essentially, I'd like to hear any opinions regarding
>> the 64 bit and 32 bit FreeBSD ports. NDIS support is
>> fine on both? 
>>
>> My machine is a Compaq Presario V2000 series, in case
>> someone has the same, or similar. 
> 
> i heard its better to run the i386 version of BSD on 64 bit machines due
> to the overhead, etc. unless you need what the 64 bit version gives you
> (addressing more memory, etc). It will work fine (I run both versions),
> but i am sure more can be turned up by a quick search of the mailing
> list etc.

Overhead ?? Would this mean that the 64 bit version will run slower?

-- 

Heinrich Rebehn

University of Bremen
Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering
- Department of Telecommunications -

Phone : +49/421/218-4664
Fax   :            -3341



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?452C8725.3070502>