Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 18:56:53 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: Eric Anderson <anderson@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gjournal + gmirror question Message-ID: <4638C2D5.2040907@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <4638BE34.3070709@freebsd.org> References: <200705021453.20372.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> <f1a3r8$2gg$1@sea.gmane.org> <46389DED.5060509@freebsd.org> <200705021631.02167.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> <f1a8bn$l9m$1@sea.gmane.org> <4638BE34.3070709@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0E2A63007D77E5775C523626 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Eric Anderson wrote: > Well, there would be less of a point to using gjournaling if you still > had to fsck the whole thing, right? With gjournaling, you can just run= > an 'fsck -p' on it, which takes less than 1 second on my 10Tb fs. So, > no need to benchmark. I understand that, but is "fsck -p" the default when gjournal is active on the file system? I don't have any active gjournal file systems so I don't know. --------------enig0E2A63007D77E5775C523626 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGOMLaldnAQVacBcgRAuTvAJ9tz6ddcAyiuh2IKlKU71cCzdNQcgCg4Ewp mhdD383rnIYX9v6is4zQboc= =nZYx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0E2A63007D77E5775C523626--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4638C2D5.2040907>