Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:00:34 +0200 From: Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@gmail.com> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0 Message-ID: <469FA6C2.4090202@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070718161652.G561@10.0.0.1> References: <20070716233030.D92541@10.0.0.1> <469E83F8.3090103@gmail.com> <20070718142649.Y561@10.0.0.1> <469E897B.7080100@gmail.com> <20070718150613.W561@10.0.0.1> <469E9BDB.7020500@gmail.com> <20070718161652.G561@10.0.0.1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeff Roberson schreef: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Rene Ladan wrote: > >> Jeff Roberson schreef: >>> >>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Rene Ladan wrote: >>> >>>> Jeff Roberson schreef: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Rene Ladan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Jeff Roberson schreef: >>>>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/ule.diff >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This patch is scheduled for inclusion in 7.0. I would like >>>>>>> anyone who >>>>>>> cares to run it to validate that it does not create any stability or >>>>>>> performance regression over the existing ULE. This patch >>>>>>> replaces ULE >>>>>>> with SCHED_SMP, which will now no longer exist as a seperate fork of >>>>>>> ULE. >>>>>> [..] >>>>>> >> > > Thank you. > > This is definitely a KSE/ULE problem. Can you try > http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/sched_ule.c? I have made some changes > that may fix this. cvsuped today at 17:23 UTC and replaced sched_ule.c afterwards. The almost-instant panics are gone. Also, the oddity I reported about ULE/BOINC on this list earlier has been fixed by the new sched_ule.c, I've noticed however that the WCPU field in top sometimes exceeds 100% (this wasn't the case with sched_4bsd). Thanks, Rene -- GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) "It won't fit on the line." -- me, 2001
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?469FA6C2.4090202>