Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:57:26 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Jonathan Horne <freebsd@dfwlp.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cups builds on one, but rejected by another? Message-ID: <473B6F46.2070509@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200711141543.27342.freebsd@dfwlp.com> References: <200711141539.47515.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <200711141543.27342.freebsd@dfwlp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jonathan Horne wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: >> my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of its >> items it updated: >> >> [root@canopus ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- >> cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System >> >> but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: >> >> ===> cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: >> => cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. >> Reference: >> <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/8dd9722c-8e97-11dc-b8f6-001c2514716 >> c.html> => Please update your ports tree and try again. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build >> it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port security >> settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. >> >> thanks, > > another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it says: > > Affects: > cups-base <1.3.3_1 > > but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. One or the other has either a stale portaudit database or ports tree. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?473B6F46.2070509>