Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:54:13 +0100
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <47440E55.3060909@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <fi12dg$7u7$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <4741905E.8050300@chistydom.ru>	<fhs3s5$knj$1@ger.gmane.org>	<47419AB3.5030008@chistydom.ru>	<fhs7hp$2es$2@ger.gmane.org>	<4741A7DA.2050706@chistydom.ru>	<4741DA15.9000308@FreeBSD.org>	<47429DB8.7040504@chistydom.ru>	<4742ADFE.40902@FreeBSD.org>	<4742C46A.1060701@chistydom.ru>	<47432F77.3030606@FreeBSD.org>	<474339E9.4080301@FreeBSD.org>	<4743629B.9090408@FreeBSD.org>	<fi11k8$5ak$1@ger.gmane.org>	<47440C10.5060608@FreeBSD.org> <fi12dg$7u7$1@ger.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>>
>>>> Try this one instead, it applies to HEAD.  You'll need to manually enter
>>>> the paths though because of how p4 mangles diffs.
>>> It doesn't help, at least in my case (only 4 clients) - the sys time is
>>> still around 30% on a 4-CPU machine.
>> I've already explained why that is meaningless.
> 
> Yes, but I had to verify it anyway :)

You haven't verified anything until you look at how much work the system 
is doing, before and after.

Kris




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47440E55.3060909>