Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:57:11 +0100
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <4745ED27.6060401@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <fi43da$kc8$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <4741905E.8050300@chistydom.ru>	<4742ADFE.40902@FreeBSD.org>	<4742C46A.1060701@chistydom.ru>	<47432F77.3030606@FreeBSD.org>	<474339E9.4080301@FreeBSD.org>	<4743629B.9090408@FreeBSD.org>	<fi11k8$5ak$1@ger.gmane.org>	<47440C10.5060608@FreeBSD.org>	<fi12dg$7u7$1@ger.gmane.org>	<47440E55.3060909@FreeBSD.org>	<9bbcef730711210320s73c0625bh25ba2561b270f237@mail.gmail.com>	<47448CC2.7030100@FreeBSD.org> <fi43da$kc8$1@ger.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> On 21/11/2007, Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>> Ivan Voras wrote:
>>>>> Yes, but I had to verify it anyway :)
>>>> You haven't verified anything until you look at how much work the system
>>>> is doing, before and after.
>>> I have, and it's roughly the same (50 +/- 2 queries/s).
>>>
>>> (meaning that I'm not interested in exact statistics here, but in
>>> order-of-magnitude changes, which didn't happen).
>> OK, let's take a step back here.  Did you obtain the lock profiling
>> trace and verify that you're seeing the same problem as Alexey?  Can I
>> see the trace?
> 
> Here it is:
> 
> http://ivoras.sharanet.org/stuff/lock_profile.txt
> 
> This is without your patch.
> 
> There's a lot of ZFS locks in there, but it seems lockmgr:ufs and
> lockmgr:zfs have the largest records:
> 
> 299117621   1474776121       148663     1042821  1414     0          513
>          440 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2035 (lockmgr:ufs)
> 
> 117958368    847566147       182093        2676 316728    68
> 948          374 /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c:515 (lockmgr:zfs)
> 
> Which is surprising since all the working-set file systems are on ZFS,
> only the root and /tmp are on UFS. /tmp also holds sockets for the
> databases.
> 
> Your reading of the lock profile will be appreciated.

OK, how about with?

Kris




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4745ED27.6060401>