Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:26:07 +0100
From:      Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
To:        "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" <wundram@beenic.net>
Cc:        "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <47AAB28F.10705@bsdforen.de>
In-Reply-To: <200802070818.45400.wundram@beenic.net>
References:  <50460.33951.qm@web34512.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	<20080207151415.06393db1@meijome.net>	<47AAA5F0.4090803@highperformance.net> <200802070818.45400.wundram@beenic.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 07:32:16 schrieb Jason C. Wells:
>> Norberto Meijome wrote:
>>> But I agree with Wojciech..do you really want to use swap files?
>> One could mount an md filesystem and then use that as swap.  That way
>> you wouldn't need to use any disc space.  As a plus, the performance
>> would be way better than disc.
> 
> Ahem, sorry, that's just plain stupid. Either the md system is backed up by 
> RAM (in which case you don't need the swap anyway; why'd you want to access 
> RAM by putting it in a swap on an md in RAM?), or it's backed up by swap, in 
> which case you have a chicken and egg problem.
> 

Or it's backed by a file (-t vnode, which is implicated by -f). I have used 
files for swap, just to see weather it works, others have done it because they 
had to.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47AAB28F.10705>