Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:37:54 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com> To: "E. J. Cerejo" <ejcerejo@optonline.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by "evolution" Message-ID: <47AF60A2.6080706@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: <47AF1AB3.80702@optonline.net> References: <47ADE033.7070402@optonline.net> <47ADE2EC.2030906@infracaninophile.co.uk> <47ADEAD2.2030803@bsdforen.de> <200802092346.23078.ejcerejo@optonline.net> <47AEF9B5.10509@onetel.com> <20080210084035.551b9acf@scorpio> <47AF1AB3.80702@optonline.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
E. J. Cerejo wrote: > Gerard wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +0000 >> Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com> wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >> >>> portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing >>> >> >> Just running: >> >> portmanager -u -l -p -y >> >> should correct the problem as well. Make sure the ports tree is up to >> date prior to running that command however. >> >> > I think this is similar to running portupgrade -urf icu, it will > re-upgrade icu and all the the ports that depend on it. It's 239 > packages and I really don't want to do that. portmanager -s only lists what needs to be done, it doesn't change anything. It shows which packages are up to date, which are out of date, which are current but have been built with out of date dependencies, which are missing etc. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47AF60A2.6080706>