Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:13:38 +0300
From:      Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
To:        Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
Cc:        freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: x11/gdm: default IPv6 disables IPv4 for xdmcp
Message-ID:  <48751517@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
In-Reply-To: <1166295004.21155.8.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> (Joe Marcus Clarke's message of "Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:50:04 -0500")
References:  <00614590@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <1166295004.21155.8.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:50:04 -0500 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 22:30 +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:

> > Way back before gnome-2.14 IPv6 and IPv4 were mutual exclusive.
> > Current gdm-2.16.4 behaves the same:
> > 
> > - gdm built with defaults listens only at udp6:
> > %netstat -a | grep xdm
> > udp6       0      0  *.xdmcp                *.*
> > 
> > - disabling IPv6 helps to listen at udp4.

> GDM has been fixed so that if IPv6 support is enabled, IPv4 support will
> still work iff v6 does not at runtime.  So, GDM will attempt to bind

OK. As I understand it is so designed that with current defaults
(GENERIC kernel, GDM built with default values, etc -- i.e. the
recommended testing machine) GDM will not give IPv4 xdmcp access...

> using an IPv6 address.  Previously, if this failed, and IPv6 support was
> enabled, GDM would not enable XDMCP support.  Now, it will fallback to
> IPv4.

...or I totally misunerstood you.


WBR
-- 
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48751517>