Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:35:17 -0600
From:      Programmer In Training <pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us>
To:        FreeBSD Chat <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
Subject:   FreeBSD vs. Linux vs. Win2k
Message-ID:  <4B58AC75.3090100@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig31133FF51135CCAF03404C95
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The FreeBSD os comparison[0] mentioned in the subject line is woefully
out of date. Where would I go to bug someone about a newer one? I'm
telling a (relatively) minted geek friend of mine who wants benchmarks
and stats on FreeBSD vs. Windows XP (and when 7 is supposedly ready for
prime time, that too).

Keeping something like this up-to-date is definitely would make it a
good talking point (with such marketing comparisons kept archived for
reference) for FreeBSD advocacy.

[0]: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
--=20
PIT


--------------enig31133FF51135CCAF03404C95
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLWKx8AAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0eNAH/20EjzkL9k0WHbIOlDVsp7JM
KlxTmkjlH19ymFoEETRJNa3YVVq6SoOn1Wc3ytepXKuu/Sm27EF22lTINJryMjgn
2sRPKMsPwfpMLTXWtrKFstU5S1x0MowY9FDwqP+kOG1i6apHkSRd9T9x3iI2Q4nA
y5KZhKn03790tNjIKlPB/MY0mCaSnmVxxzi2vJCz8K9Uc5CUABwSxvULGL8VUAlQ
GtbJ9SpgvKYt2gxfpd+AE3zOg5WjJPZlciA/TzrxesRKY4Yj2xvYtJtPSK3JJMPn
bPYPa8hvzuAH2Rlj7t0kYOZi/8GTk2qE/w1emKHPrnLMmC60YKUlEiyj6yyKI3A=
=DGlP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig31133FF51135CCAF03404C95--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B58AC75.3090100>