Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:21:03 +0200 From: Beat Gaetzi <beat@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Updating security/nss Message-ID: <4BBCDB1F.4060107@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1270408368.32902.37.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <4BB08760.3090906@FreeBSD.org> <1270408368.32902.37.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 12:56 +0200, Beat Gaetzi wrote: >> The upcoming update of SeaMonkey to 2.0.4 requires a newer version of >> security/nss: >> http://tmp.chruetertee.ch/seamonkey-2.0.4.log >> >> I've created a patch to update NSS to 3.12.6: >> http://tmp.chruetertee.ch/nss-3126.patch >> >> With this version of NSS SeaMonkey 2.0.4 builds fine. I haven't done any >> further testing. I first want to ask if there are any plans for updating >> security/nss to a newer version? > > We do not yet have it in MC. I have no objection to this patch being > committed. I've run a test on a tinderbox with 8.0-STABLE i386 and tested the ports depending on security/nss with 3.12.6. Beside a build failure of ruby (which doesn't look related to nss) I couldn't found a problem: http://gecko.miwibox.org/index.php?action=list_buildports&build=8-FreeBSD_i386 Also the update to 3.12.6 does not include a shlib bump so I think there is no PORTREVISION bump of the depending ports needed. Does this update somehow interfere with the upcoming gnome update? Thanks, Beat
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BBCDB1F.4060107>