Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:47:55 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No-op port updates Message-ID: <4CB9D73B.1080800@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=sPgM4o0TPTpEJmp5KmrKFHtPbKYTdZAXE%2B4tW@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTi=sPgM4o0TPTpEJmp5KmrKFHtPbKYTdZAXE%2B4tW@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/16/2010 8:30 AM, Rob Farmer wrote: > What is the best practice for no-op port updates - i.e. version 1.0 > and 1.1 produce identical FreeBSD packages but they might be different > on Linux/elsewhere? Update to have to port appear "current" or avoid > forcing people to do unnecessary updates? When faced with similar situations in the past I have chosen not to update, until the whinging became too extreme. :) This is one of those where there is no "right" answer. FWIW, Doug -- Breadth of IT experience, and | Nothin' ever doesn't change, depth of knowledge in the DNS. | but nothin' changes much. Yours for the right price. :) | -- OK Go http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CB9D73B.1080800>