Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:29:39 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: volker@vwsoft.com Cc: FreeBSD current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: c 213323 breaks Sony Vaio P11Z w/o acpi Message-ID: <4CC15983.80003@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4CC154C5.3020500@vwsoft.com> References: <4CBCCAB8.4090500@vwsoft.com> <4CBD24FA.8040302@icyb.net.ua> <4CC1510C.2020000@freebsd.org> <4CC154C5.3020500@vwsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 22/10/2010 12:09 volker@vwsoft.com said the following: > On 10/22/10 10:53, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> [ping] > > Sorry, Andriy! > > I haven't found the time to hack yesterday. The Intel website doesn't provide > the 20091221 tarball anymore (but a more recent one) and I need to lay my hands > on the script and the code tarball to get it working. As a result, I hope I can > provide a more recent script that should work out of the box. > > Please stay tuned (I guess I'll find the time to get it working over the > upcoming weekend). Volker, thanks a lot! Perhaps, meanwhile you can provide a verbose boot dmesg? The problem that you get is quite unexpected. Essentially, that division by zero that you get is a form of an assert and I am planning to put a real KASSERT there. Neither cpu_logical nor cpu_cores should be zero after that loop because they both should be incremented when the iterator is equal to boot CPU ID. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CC15983.80003>